[webarch-websites] Using subversion to edit the Webarchitects new site content

[Kate Dawson]

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 07:05:17PM +0100, Chris Croome wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Sat 28-May-2016 at 06:37:00PM +0100, Kate Dawson wrote:
> > 
> > Because it's dead tech...
> 
> 
> If it is ever re-written to match the latest fad then we can switch to
> git at that point...


Suggesting that git a fad is odd... however.. 

Helping our less technical members learn git, rather than
dividing their efforts on both git and svn would be better. SVN is dead,
and pointless to invest time learning. 

However, that what we are using here, so I wont challenge the design
choice further. However I would suggest that we don't use svn for any
other projects.

Whateva!

Kate
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.webarch.co.uk/pipermail/webarch-websites/attachments/20160528/91bfdb34/attachment.bin>