Reply-To [was: Re: [spurkis@mkdoc.com: Re: Sessions and Users, was:
Re: [Pangloss] [RFC] OpenFrame AppKit ideas]]
Steve Purkis
spurkis at mkdoc.com
Thu Apr 10 13:58:50 BST 2003
On Thursday, April 10, 2003, at 11:35 am, Chris Croome wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think this was supposed to go to the list...
Certainly was. forgot to cut n paste again.
> Regarding Steves request for munging the Reply-To header -- have you
> read this?
>
> "Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful
> An Earnest Plea to Mailing List Administrators
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Skimmed through it, and while there are valid points I still think
setting Reply-To is handy for lists. It's that "Don't make me think"
principle, coupled with the fact that it's easier to change a mailing
list's config than a mailer. Still, I'll pester Apple too :).
-Steve
More information about the Pangloss
mailing list