[Pangloss] Re: glossary (Pangloss) -- accounts for proof readers

[Chris Croome]

Hi

On Thu 27-Feb-2003 at 10:26:16AM +0000, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
> > > Would a common LDAP backend for this make sense?
> > 
> > It would indeed.  Especially if they plan on using email to communicate &
> > co-ordinate translations...
> 
> Mod_Perl has a HORDE of authentication + authorization modules to
> authenticate against, basically, anything.
> 
> If Pangloss was relying on this system, we could use MKDoc's
> authorization handler to authenticate directly on MKDoc.
> 
> IMHO it's a lot less work and incredibly broader than LDAP. 

Oh, OK, I wasn't aware of that. Would this mean that Pangloss
couldn't be used without MKDoc? Or could you put MKDoc's
authorization handler onto CPAN?

Chris

-- 
Chris Croome                                         <chris at mkdoc.com>
MKDoc                                                http://mkdoc.com/