[Petal] New syntaxes

[Fergal Daly]

On Wednesday 09 July 2003 15:43, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
> > This reminds me of something else I meant to mention - modifiers. They are 
> > <snip />
> 
> > sub perl
> > {
> > 	my $self = shift;
> > 	my $expr = shift;
> > 
> > 	return "uc($expr)";
> > }
> 
> Surely this method should be called 'inline' shouldn't it?

Yep, that'd be better. I called it "perl" to match the interface to CodePerl 
objects but now that I think of it, the perl method for CodePerl objects 
doesn't take an argument

> This sounds like an excellent plan. I'm looking forward to it.
> 
> It would be good to see how those coolie changes work. I'm looking
> forward to the next release of CodePerl... It'll be interesting to see
> if it works with all my existing Petal templates :) 

I think I can figure out a way to make old style and new style modifiers work 
together. Don't know about a date for that though, I'm off to the UK tomorrow 
to do a couple of interviews. If I get a real job my "productivity" could 
drop rapidly!

F