From u15119 at hs-harz.de Sat Jan 14 18:10:18 2006
From: u15119 at hs-harz.de (Christoph Thielecke)
Date: Sat Jan 14 18:11:15 2006
Subject: [Petal] Petal bug: sub elements not translated
Message-ID: <200601141910.23375.u15119@hs-harz.de>
Hi list,
I've upgraded from 2.14 to 2.17 and the translation of substrings stops to
work.
Here is an example:
Fedora Core 4 RPMs added (RPM, Debug
RPM).
will produce:
Fedora Core 4 RPMs added (${1}, ${2}).
In 2.14 the ${1} will be replaced with the first sub string (...),
in 2.17 this wont work.
Can you fix that?
Best regards
Christoph
--
Linux User Group Wernigerode
http://www.lug-wr.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.webarch.co.uk/pipermail/petal/attachments/20060114/6ab2cb0a/attachment.bin
From bruno at mkdoc.com Tue Jan 17 13:26:16 2006
From: bruno at mkdoc.com (Bruno Postle)
Date: Tue Jan 17 13:26:33 2006
Subject: [Petal] bug: sub elements not translated (and 2.18 released)
In-Reply-To: <200601141910.23375.u15119@hs-harz.de>
References: <200601141910.23375.u15119@hs-harz.de>
Message-ID: <20060117132616.GA2756@mkdoc.com>
On Sat 14-Jan-2006 at 19:10 +0100, Christoph Thielecke wrote:
>
> I've upgraded from 2.14 to 2.17 and the translation of substrings
> stops to work.
Yes thanks for the test, this was a bug introduced into 2.16 to
allow template designers to use text such as ${1} and ${5foo} in
templates.
I've reverted to the old behaviour and released Petal-2.18 to CPAN,
though it may not have yet appeared on your local mirror.
Changes since 2.17:
* $Petal::CodeGenerator::PI_RE should be applied newline
insensitively, petal attributes can now contain multiple lines.
* Minor pod fixes.
* Cookbook tal:repeat example (DSL)
* Pod note that on-error isn't fully implemented
* Defang html metacharacters in on-error output
* Undo 2.16 $Petal::Hash::String::VARIABLE_RE_BRACKETS ${1} regression
--
Bruno
From u15119 at hs-harz.de Tue Jan 17 13:31:02 2006
From: u15119 at hs-harz.de (Christoph Thielecke)
Date: Tue Jan 17 13:31:58 2006
Subject: [Petal] bug: sub elements not translated (and 2.18 released)
In-Reply-To: <20060117132616.GA2756@mkdoc.com>
References: <200601141910.23375.u15119@hs-harz.de>
<20060117132616.GA2756@mkdoc.com>
Message-ID: <200601171431.02754.u15119@hs-harz.de>
Hello Bruno,
> > I've upgraded from 2.14 to 2.17 and the translation of substrings
> > stops to work.
>
> Yes thanks for the test, this was a bug introduced into 2.16 to
> allow template designers to use text such as ${1} and ${5foo} in
> templates.
>
> I've reverted to the old behaviour and released Petal-2.18 to CPAN,
> though it may not have yet appeared on your local mirror.
Thx a lot.
Best regards
Christoph
--
Linux User Group Wernigerode
http://www.lug-wr.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.webarch.co.uk/pipermail/petal/attachments/20060117/4f9cc506/attachment.bin
From petal-list at 2xlp.com Fri Jan 20 21:20:04 2006
From: petal-list at 2xlp.com (Jonathan)
Date: Fri Jan 20 21:48:41 2006
Subject: [Petal] bug: documentation uses unsupported (but TAL spec) modifier
In-Reply-To: <200601171431.02754.u15119@hs-harz.de>
References: <200601141910.23375.u15119@hs-harz.de>
<20060117132616.GA2756@mkdoc.com>
<200601171431.02754.u15119@hs-harz.de>
Message-ID: <73E5F164-0603-46AC-A6D8-36D945776B6A@2xlp.com>
I noticed this today in the petal documentation:
=======
omit-tag
Abstract
Some contents
Example
I may not be bold.
If not:bold is evaluated as TRUE, then the tag will be omited. If
not:bold is evaluated as FALSE, then the tag will stay in place.
Why?
omit-tag statements can be used to leave the contents of a tag in
place while omitting the surrounding start and end tags if the
expression which is evaluated is TRUE.
TIP:
If you want to ALWAYS remove a tag, you can use omit-tag="string:1"
=======
i've discussed this before, but "not:" is a TAL modifier that isn't
in petal
i just wanted to bring this up again, as following the docs in this
case will cause an error
i suggest either:
* patching petal to use not: which is in the TAL spec (patch below)
* including the Petal Modifier on the TAL doc, so that will work and
others in the future will see it
* changing the docs from not to false
in that order of preference
Petal Modifier method:
=====
use Petal ();
$Petal::Hash::MODIFIERS->{'not:'} = sub { return ( $_[0]->fetch($_
[1]) ? 0 : 1 ); };
=====
Patch
=====
diff -Naur Petal-2.18-dist/lib/Petal/Hash.pm Petal-2.18-patched/lib/
Petal/Hash.pm
--- Petal-2.18-dist/lib/Petal/Hash.pm 2005-03-16 10:23:36.000000000
-0500
+++ Petal-2.18-patched/lib/Petal/Hash.pm 2006-01-20
16:08:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -71,6 +71,14 @@
};
+# not modifier
+$MODIFIERS->{'not:'} = sub {
+ my $hash = shift;
+ my $variable = join ' ', @_;
+ return not $hash->fetch ("true:$variable");
+};
+
+
# encode: modifier (deprecated stuff)
$MODIFIERS->{'encode:'} = sub {
warn "Petal modifier encode: is deprecated";
=====
Sorry, but I don't know the correct way to generate a diff for patching.
it's just adding this
====
# not modifier
$MODIFIERS->{'not:'} = sub {
my $hash = shift;
my $variable = join ' ', @_;
return not $hash->fetch ("true:$variable");
};
=====
to lib/Petal/Hash.pm - its an exact copy of the false function, just
s/false/not/g , and right below it. there's probably a better way to
consolidate not: and false: into 1 modifier, but that works.
From jon at 2xlp.com Wed Jan 25 06:45:14 2006
From: jon at 2xlp.com (Jonathan Vanasco)
Date: Wed Jan 25 08:42:25 2006
Subject: [Petal] bug: documentation uses unsupported (but TAL spec)
modifier
In-Reply-To: <73E5F164-0603-46AC-A6D8-36D945776B6A@2xlp.com>
References: <200601141910.23375.u15119@hs-harz.de>
<20060117132616.GA2756@mkdoc.com>
<200601171431.02754.u15119@hs-harz.de>
<73E5F164-0603-46AC-A6D8-36D945776B6A@2xlp.com>
Message-ID:
actually, i realized a more elegant solution-
lib/Petal/Hash.pm
( add this line @72 )
=====
$MODIFIERS->{'not:'} = $MODIFIERS->{'false:'};
=====
that uses the same approach as the rest of Petal. I was tired and
didn't notice that would work earlier.
sorry for suggesting a poor patch earlier.
From bruno at mkdoc.com Fri Jan 27 13:31:05 2006
From: bruno at mkdoc.com (Bruno Postle)
Date: Fri Jan 27 13:31:10 2006
Subject: [Petal] bug: documentation uses unsupported (but TAL spec)
modifier
In-Reply-To: <73E5F164-0603-46AC-A6D8-36D945776B6A@2xlp.com>
References: <200601141910.23375.u15119@hs-harz.de>
<20060117132616.GA2756@mkdoc.com>
<200601171431.02754.u15119@hs-harz.de>
<73E5F164-0603-46AC-A6D8-36D945776B6A@2xlp.com>
Message-ID: <20060127133105.GE1993@mkdoc.com>
On Fri 20-Jan-2006 at 16:20 -0500, Jonathan wrote:
>
> i've discussed this before, but "not:" is a TAL modifier that isn't
> in petal
> i suggest either:
> * patching petal to use not: which is in the TAL spec (patch below)
> * changing the docs from not to false
Thanks, I've added 'not:' as an alias to 'false:' in Petal::Hash.
Note that 'not:', 'string:' and 'path:' are required by TALES:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ZPT/TALES%20Specification%201.3
So Petal is still missing 'path:'.
--
Bruno
From petal-list at 2xlp.com Fri Jan 27 16:28:36 2006
From: petal-list at 2xlp.com (Jonathan Vanasco)
Date: Fri Jan 27 16:28:59 2006
Subject: [Petal] bug: documentation uses unsupported (but TAL spec)
modifier
In-Reply-To: <20060127133105.GE1993@mkdoc.com>
References: <200601141910.23375.u15119@hs-harz.de>
<20060117132616.GA2756@mkdoc.com>
<200601171431.02754.u15119@hs-harz.de>
<73E5F164-0603-46AC-A6D8-36D945776B6A@2xlp.com>
<20060127133105.GE1993@mkdoc.com>
Message-ID: <461CC40C-CDBF-448F-AD7A-3566AEDCE693@2xlp.com>
On Jan 27, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Bruno Postle wrote:
> Thanks, I've added 'not:' as an alias to 'false:' in Petal::Hash.
>
> Note that 'not:', 'string:' and 'path:' are required by TALES:
> http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ZPT/TALES%
> 20Specification%201.3
>
> So Petal is still missing 'path:'.
I guess the first person who needs to use it gets to make the patch!
( crosses fingers and hopes thats not me )
From bruno at mkdoc.com Mon Jan 30 16:21:59 2006
From: bruno at mkdoc.com (Bruno Postle)
Date: Mon Jan 30 16:27:09 2006
Subject: [Petal] bug: documentation uses unsupported (but TAL
spec) modifier
In-Reply-To:
References: <200601141910.23375.u15119@hs-harz.de> <20060117132616.GA2756@mkdoc.com> <200601171431.02754.u15119@hs-harz.de> <73E5F164-0603-46AC-A6D8-36D945776B6A@2xlp.com>
Message-ID: <43DE3D27.2000102@mkdoc.com>
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
>
> actually, i realized a more elegant solution-
> $MODIFIERS->{'not:'} = $MODIFIERS->{'false:'};
Yep, that's exactly what I did:
https://lists.webarch.co.uk/pipermail/mkdoc-commit/2006-January/001087.html
--
Bruno